In the opening line " Government assistance is a greater threat to the press than any new technology..." I completely agree.
Through out history things have changed and evolved in every aspect of life. In journalism there have been many changes. Information used to be handwritten, then the use of a type writer came about, there were paper boys that rode their bikes to deliver the papers. Now there are better computers, faster ways of presenting and distributing information and other forms of communication that didn't exist 50 years ago.
Murdoch says that " newspapers have prospered for one reason: trust." Which I agree. If people that read the paper do not trust what is being told or shown, they are going to stop reading it, plain and simple.
This article here, http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/apr/14/studentmediaawards, discusses that with the changes of journalism, the old rules still apply. Sources still need to be attributed, truth still needs to be told, legal issues, grammar ...etc.
In Murdoch's article, he is basically saying that with the emergence of e-books and online papers as well as the internet in general, journalism is going to change, but it is not going to be different. It has changed time after time and the concept is still the same, give the news that people want. Report on a story and tell people what is going on in today's society.
The government seems to be the "problem." He is saying that the government regulations have been making the way of spreading information difficult, where in the past it was not this hard. The government was never so involved in past, where today it most definitely is.
Murdoch also says that "technology now allows us to do this on a much greater scale." Meaning that we can reach billions of people in a number of minutes. Information can much easily be distributed nowadays.
I also agree with what he says that the digital age is not at fault. I think that it has probably even helped. People want things right away. People want to see pictures, they want video and all other things included in their news. They don't just want a piece of paper with 500 words telling what happened. People want to feel involved.
This is an interesting clip of Murdoch talking about how technology has changed media.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQSKRWXyFw8
In the ways that journalism has changed with the internet and new technology, the government also needs to adapt. News is more competitive now. The government needs to assist reporters and journalists as opposed to making it harder for them to gain access to information.
The government also wants to start charging for information online, which I believe is ridiculous. College students and other people with a lower income are not going to be able to pay for everything that they can get online. Since it is free, this is why people use the internet in order to gather most of their news and information.
Murdoch closes this article with this statement, "Whether the newspaper of the future is delivered with electrons or dead trees is utlimately not that important. What is most important is that the news industry remains free, independent, and competitive."
This is the article in which I have referred to: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574570191223415268.html
In addition I found this article from Harvard, which seems to state the opposite. It talks about how technology might make journalism go back to its roots. It might allow it to be the way that it once was, which I thought was very interesting.
http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=101069
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Before Break
Why do professors insist in giving students so much work to do prior to Thanksgiving break? It really bothers me that they think that that is our only class that we have. While we are expected to get our work handed in on time and make sure that we do it thoroughly, the professors don't even get the assignments graded until a month later.
It seems that I am not the only one that thinks this,
http://crushcollege.com/how-to-survive-the-two-weeks-before-thanksgiving-break/
It seems that I am not the only one that thinks this,
http://crushcollege.com/how-to-survive-the-two-weeks-before-thanksgiving-break/
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
When Ordering, Speak English
According to new figures released by the Census Bureau, there are 255 million people in the United States over the age of five. Of these, 44.9 million (17.6%) do not speak English at home. This is absolutely appalling.
Granted America is said to be the “melting pot” of the world. What does this really mean? People can come here from other countries to live the “American Dream,” but not have to learn the English language?
Looking back to the 1800’s when immigrants came to America from hundreds of different countries; they were not able to speak English. They had to learn. They had to learn English in order to survive; so they did. Why is it that now, in 2009, people are coming from all over the world and they gain the same privileges as a U.S. citizen, but they are unable to communicate in daily life?
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, “If the 44.9 million U.S. residents who don't speak English at home were concentrated in the heartland, they would make up the entire population of all the states from Wisconsin to Idaho, down through Nevada to New Mexico and across to Arkansas. There are more people in the United States of America today who do not speak English at home than there are people, in Spain.”
Personally, as a U.S. citizen this is quite upsetting. My great grandparents as well as grandparents came to the United States from Italy. They did not know one lick of English, but they learned. In order to make a life for themselves and their families this is what had to be done.
There is no reason why everything today should be printed one version English, one version Spanish. There is no reason when I make a call I should have to press 1 for English or 2 for Spanish. This is America; if you don’t speak English go back to your own country.
If you are from Mexico and you speak Spanish that’s fine, do it in the comfort of your home, when you are in a public place you should be able to speak English. If you are from China and you speak Chinese in the comfort of your home, that’s great, but in public you should be able to speak English.
On the flip side, if an American were to go live in Spain, they should learn Spanish. I find it to be rude and degrading that people from other countries come here and take advantage of our Freedom of Speech. Being bilingual is great and in many places today an advantage, but in America, English should be the first and main language that is spoken.
By now, we all know the controversial story with Joey Vento and his speak English sign. Vento is the owner of Geno’s Steaks, a popular tourist attraction in South Philadelphia. Last February, Vento placed a small sign in the window that read “This is America, when ordering speak English.”
Information from “The Philadelphia Inquirer,” said, Although the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations filed a discrimination complaint against Geno’s (which the commission eventually lost), Vento said the sign was never meant to be offensive.
“This country is a melting pot, but what makes it work is the English language,” Vento told members of the commission.
How we react to this “speak English” sign says a lot about who we are and what we believe in. In other words, you should not only be permitted to speak in your native tongue, but you should do it with pride, and resist anyone or anything that tells you otherwise.
For more info, check out:
http://chalkandtalk.wordpress.com/2009/02/14/joey-vento-multicultural-ideology-and-the-%E2%80%98speak-english%E2%80%99-sign/
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=joey+vento+speak+english&search_type=&aq=f
Granted America is said to be the “melting pot” of the world. What does this really mean? People can come here from other countries to live the “American Dream,” but not have to learn the English language?
Looking back to the 1800’s when immigrants came to America from hundreds of different countries; they were not able to speak English. They had to learn. They had to learn English in order to survive; so they did. Why is it that now, in 2009, people are coming from all over the world and they gain the same privileges as a U.S. citizen, but they are unable to communicate in daily life?
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, “If the 44.9 million U.S. residents who don't speak English at home were concentrated in the heartland, they would make up the entire population of all the states from Wisconsin to Idaho, down through Nevada to New Mexico and across to Arkansas. There are more people in the United States of America today who do not speak English at home than there are people, in Spain.”
Personally, as a U.S. citizen this is quite upsetting. My great grandparents as well as grandparents came to the United States from Italy. They did not know one lick of English, but they learned. In order to make a life for themselves and their families this is what had to be done.
There is no reason why everything today should be printed one version English, one version Spanish. There is no reason when I make a call I should have to press 1 for English or 2 for Spanish. This is America; if you don’t speak English go back to your own country.
If you are from Mexico and you speak Spanish that’s fine, do it in the comfort of your home, when you are in a public place you should be able to speak English. If you are from China and you speak Chinese in the comfort of your home, that’s great, but in public you should be able to speak English.
On the flip side, if an American were to go live in Spain, they should learn Spanish. I find it to be rude and degrading that people from other countries come here and take advantage of our Freedom of Speech. Being bilingual is great and in many places today an advantage, but in America, English should be the first and main language that is spoken.
By now, we all know the controversial story with Joey Vento and his speak English sign. Vento is the owner of Geno’s Steaks, a popular tourist attraction in South Philadelphia. Last February, Vento placed a small sign in the window that read “This is America, when ordering speak English.”
Information from “The Philadelphia Inquirer,” said, Although the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations filed a discrimination complaint against Geno’s (which the commission eventually lost), Vento said the sign was never meant to be offensive.
“This country is a melting pot, but what makes it work is the English language,” Vento told members of the commission.
How we react to this “speak English” sign says a lot about who we are and what we believe in. In other words, you should not only be permitted to speak in your native tongue, but you should do it with pride, and resist anyone or anything that tells you otherwise.
For more info, check out:
http://chalkandtalk.wordpress.com/2009/02/14/joey-vento-multicultural-ideology-and-the-%E2%80%98speak-english%E2%80%99-sign/
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=joey+vento+speak+english&search_type=&aq=f
Monday, October 26, 2009
College is Flying By...
I can honestly remember the first day of college my freshman year. I know that I was wearing a green 'Italia' tee shirt and cut off jean shorts. It was like 100 degrees and so humid. Looking back now over the past 4 years it is crazy to me that I only have 21 weeks left of my college career.
Where has the time gone? It seems that every semester goes by quicker. It is already the ninth week of this semester and I feel like we just started. Being my senior year and getting ready to graduate this May, I must say that I have bittersweet feelings. I am ready to graduate and get into the "real world," however, I am nervous about not being able to find a job. With the economy today God only knows who will land a job after graduation.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Big Companies using Social Media
Enterprises and companies are now using Twitter, LinkedIn and other social media sites to draw in more customers as well as provide information and to persuade people. This article below gives a brief idea of what I am talking about,
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/social_media_for_business_who_is_doing_it.php
It is quite an interesting topic to think about.
The companies are targeting aspecific audience on the internet, they have ads, photos and videos that catch the person's eye. Some companies such as H&R Block even use FaceBook to post ads as well as advice to consumers.
Companies such as Starbucks even post online a suggestions area for customers to list things that the company could and should improve upon. It's pretty crazy to me that all of these changes are happening right now. I am excited and nervous to see how it will affect me in trying to get a job after graduation this May.
All of these online techiques have the same common goal. Draw in more customers. Some companies are better at it than others. I personally like the idea of a suggestion area where I can speak my mind and say how to make the product or service better. However, I am not a fan of surveys, unless they are short. I hate taking time to answer a long survey about something.
This website also had something to say about social media and companies,
http://www.socialmediaclub.org/2009/05/31/smcq12-how-are-companies-using-social-media-to-empower-their-workforce/comment-page-1/
It also has a short little audio clip.
Much of the future workplace is happening NOW. So the internet is a great way todo things in a timely manner. Technology has made our world as we know it today, much, much different.
NORG, print vs. online
It is thought that the NORG, newsgathering organization, is the next big thing in journalism. It is co-operative, fulfills the functions of a wire service aggregating coverage from small news-gathering entities.
this website is particularily interesting,
http://www.adlawbyrequest.com/2009/02/articles/in-the-courts/news-gathering-in-an-internet-age/
How does a NORG serve a democracy where not everyone has a computer, or access to the internet?
This seems to be a rather intriguing question. I would have to say that it is very hard to answer. Most of the older population still reads the newspaper for their information. If you really look at a newspaper now, there is a website listed to see the paper online, or for further information, which seems to be an attempt. Also, on TV they have listings to visit their website for more information or to post your comments or opinions. This is an attempt, but I don't think that it does a great job. It is difficult for NORG's to serve the public when not everyone has access to a computer. In today's day and age the younger population, almost all, have access to the internet whether it be via computer or cell phone.
I must also say that today's economy has a lot to do with this. It is expensive to buy a computer or labtop. Even though it is much, much cheaper than it used to be, people are not making as much money that they used to. Some people might not even have a job.
Younger people are more educated and know more about technology and the internet. They know what websites to go to, how to login to a computer, they know that most sites and information is free. I know personally, that I know how to access information online, whereas my grandfather doesn't even know how to turn a computer on.
This site, I found very, very interesting. It discusses print information, i.e. newspaper, compared to gathering information on the internet... http://www.shawnolson.net/a/1226/online-vs-print.html
It is also much cheaper to gather and view information online,
"It turns out that printed advertising, while essential for some markets, is becoming less effective as the consumer public learns to ignore ads. It’s no wonder that companies are seeking ways to maximize exposure while minimizing costs."
this website is particularily interesting,
http://www.adlawbyrequest.com/2009/02/articles/in-the-courts/news-gathering-in-an-internet-age/
How does a NORG serve a democracy where not everyone has a computer, or access to the internet?
This seems to be a rather intriguing question. I would have to say that it is very hard to answer. Most of the older population still reads the newspaper for their information. If you really look at a newspaper now, there is a website listed to see the paper online, or for further information, which seems to be an attempt. Also, on TV they have listings to visit their website for more information or to post your comments or opinions. This is an attempt, but I don't think that it does a great job. It is difficult for NORG's to serve the public when not everyone has access to a computer. In today's day and age the younger population, almost all, have access to the internet whether it be via computer or cell phone.
I must also say that today's economy has a lot to do with this. It is expensive to buy a computer or labtop. Even though it is much, much cheaper than it used to be, people are not making as much money that they used to. Some people might not even have a job.
Younger people are more educated and know more about technology and the internet. They know what websites to go to, how to login to a computer, they know that most sites and information is free. I know personally, that I know how to access information online, whereas my grandfather doesn't even know how to turn a computer on.
This site, I found very, very interesting. It discusses print information, i.e. newspaper, compared to gathering information on the internet... http://www.shawnolson.net/a/1226/online-vs-print.html
It is also much cheaper to gather and view information online,
"It turns out that printed advertising, while essential for some markets, is becoming less effective as the consumer public learns to ignore ads. It’s no wonder that companies are seeking ways to maximize exposure while minimizing costs."
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Podcast Reaction
I listened to a podcast about the Philadelphia Philles. This is a podcast with speaker Rich Baxter. I love the way that he talks and goes on about the Phils. He only podcasts about the Phillies, which it awesome.
I especially liked the beginning. It was actual sound from the broadcasters and live sounds from the game. "That game" being Oct. 1st when they clinched the NL East. The sound in the beginning is what really drew me into listening, and made me want to listen more. It was the sounds of the stadium, the bats, the loud and vocal announcers from the game.
After the beginning 2 minutes, Rich was joined by his friend from South Jersey who also wanted to chime in with his thoughts on the Phillies. They talked at a good pace, good vocals, and upbeat. It was very interesting to listen to in that respect.
On the other side of the ball, no pun intended, the content was, and always is, interesting to me. Briefly talking about the Phils in 1980 in the World Series, and then again in 1983, to then winning last year and the different series last year. They then began to bring it "up-to-date." Talking about how fun the Phils are to watch, how good the players are, the different teams in the division and the competition.
Overall, I enjoyed this podcast, and rather than just listening to ten minutes, I listened to the entire thing. I love sports, especially Philly sports. A lot of the things that the guys were talking about I could relate to and picture in my head since I had seen the games and most of the plays that they were talking about. This podcast was interesting in both the technical aspect in that it was easy on the ears, and it was interesting to hear what other people think and how they feel about my team. The content of course, was interesting and very intriguing. I love listening to anything about my Phillies!
Here is the link if you would like to listen to the podcast,
http://www.fightinphillies.com/2009/10/phillies-talk-podcast-phillies-win-nl.html
I especially liked the beginning. It was actual sound from the broadcasters and live sounds from the game. "That game" being Oct. 1st when they clinched the NL East. The sound in the beginning is what really drew me into listening, and made me want to listen more. It was the sounds of the stadium, the bats, the loud and vocal announcers from the game.
After the beginning 2 minutes, Rich was joined by his friend from South Jersey who also wanted to chime in with his thoughts on the Phillies. They talked at a good pace, good vocals, and upbeat. It was very interesting to listen to in that respect.
On the other side of the ball, no pun intended, the content was, and always is, interesting to me. Briefly talking about the Phils in 1980 in the World Series, and then again in 1983, to then winning last year and the different series last year. They then began to bring it "up-to-date." Talking about how fun the Phils are to watch, how good the players are, the different teams in the division and the competition.
Overall, I enjoyed this podcast, and rather than just listening to ten minutes, I listened to the entire thing. I love sports, especially Philly sports. A lot of the things that the guys were talking about I could relate to and picture in my head since I had seen the games and most of the plays that they were talking about. This podcast was interesting in both the technical aspect in that it was easy on the ears, and it was interesting to hear what other people think and how they feel about my team. The content of course, was interesting and very intriguing. I love listening to anything about my Phillies!
Here is the link if you would like to listen to the podcast,
http://www.fightinphillies.com/2009/10/phillies-talk-podcast-phillies-win-nl.html
Too Cold, Too soon...
I hate the shift from the warm summery months to the frigid fall months. I woke up this morning and did not want to get out of my bed. It seems that every year gets worse. It used to gradually get cooler from July to August to September, and the change of seasons was somewhat pleasant.
Not anymore! It goes from being hot, humid and 100 degrees, to cold, smug and 55. Who likes to go from bikinis to jeans and bundled up jackets, not me.
The most depressing thing I must say is when my tan seems to fade away. Don't get me wrong I love the different seasons I just wish that it was a gradual shift from warm to chilly, instead of hot to freezing.
This picture seems to capture the essence of what I am trying to say...
http://onlinepersonaltrainingvideobootcamp.com/blog/uploaded/Blog%20Post%20Images/Mondays/Bathing%20Suit%20Season%20Nightmares/bathing%20suits%20fit.png
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3356/3308946688_9807d5a650.jpg
Not anymore! It goes from being hot, humid and 100 degrees, to cold, smug and 55. Who likes to go from bikinis to jeans and bundled up jackets, not me.
The most depressing thing I must say is when my tan seems to fade away. Don't get me wrong I love the different seasons I just wish that it was a gradual shift from warm to chilly, instead of hot to freezing.
This picture seems to capture the essence of what I am trying to say...
http://onlinepersonaltrainingvideobootcamp.com/blog/uploaded/Blog%20Post%20Images/Mondays/Bathing%20Suit%20Season%20Nightmares/bathing%20suits%20fit.png
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3356/3308946688_9807d5a650.jpg
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Phillies Phans Go Wild!!
I must say that living in Philly has never been sweeter...
The Phillies are at it again. The defending World Series Champs are well on their way again. Last night's game against the Colorado Rockies was one of the best games I have seen them play in this year's post-season so far. Their come back in the 9th inning was insane! This game 4 was incredible.
http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=7049457&topic_id=7222328&c_id=phi
http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=7049457&topic_id=7222328&c_id=phi
http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=7049457&topic_id=7222328&c_id=phi
The Phils will start the NLCS this Thursday, Oct. 15, against the LA Dodgers, from LA. I'm crossing my fingers and having "Phaith." I especially hate Manny Ramirez, so I can't wait to watch him choke.
Here we go PHILS!!!!
The Phillies are at it again. The defending World Series Champs are well on their way again. Last night's game against the Colorado Rockies was one of the best games I have seen them play in this year's post-season so far. Their come back in the 9th inning was insane! This game 4 was incredible.
http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=7049457&topic_id=7222328&c_id=phi
http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=7049457&topic_id=7222328&c_id=phi
http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=7049457&topic_id=7222328&c_id=phi
The Phils will start the NLCS this Thursday, Oct. 15, against the LA Dodgers, from LA. I'm crossing my fingers and having "Phaith." I especially hate Manny Ramirez, so I can't wait to watch him choke.
Here we go PHILS!!!!
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Owning a Pet lowers Stress, My Opinion
There are several benefits of owning a pet, but do you know that owing a pet can actually reduce stress? Studies have shown that owning a pet can relieve certain health conditions. Owning a pet can even be as therapeutic as yoga and meditation.
Who could resist this face? http://static.desktopnexus.com/wallpapers/6707-bigthumbnail.jpg
“Pets can control blood pressure better than drugs. Inhibiting drugs reduce blood pressure, but they aren’t as effective in controlling blood pressure due to stress and tension. Owning a pet such as a dog may encourage you to get out and exercise, helping to reduce obesity. Also, American studies have shown that patients who owned a pet had a much better chance of surviving for more than a year after a heart attack,” http://preventdisease.com/lifestyle/pets/articles/more_evidence_pets_lower_stress.html
This past May, my grandmother passed away. I have never seen any two people love one another more than my grandparents. Married for 65 years, it’s needless to say that he was very upset and depressed in losing her. I thought that it would be a good idea for him to get a pet. Being old, and somewhat fragile, I figured that a cat would be a perfect fit for him. A cat is a great, loyal, reliable friend to anyone that will give it attention.
Now, four months later, he is gradually doing better, and seems to be much happier. When I asked him why, he told me because he is no longer alone. The cat has definitely helped him in more ways than one. She provides company for him while he eats dinner and she even sleeps with him. This is definitely beneficial to older people who have lost loved ones, like my grandfather, as well as people who have had health problems. Pets tend to ward off elderly depression with just a lick on the hand, or the purr of a cat.
Pets can help reduce stress more than people; even more than talking about your problems with a best friend. Recent research shows when conducting a task that’s stressful, people have truly experienced less stress when their pets were with them than when a friend or family member was present. This reason might be because pets don’t judge us, they just love us.
I know that whenever I am upset or need to talk, I always turn to my cat, Mystic. As crazy as it sounds I’m aware that other people do this as well. It’s just nice to talk and not be interrupted, or judged on what I am saying. Sometimes I don’t want my friends or family to know about things that are bothering me, so I know I can talk to my pest, and they won’t tell anyone.
For those who love animals, me included, it is virtually impossible to stay in a bad mood when a pair of loving puppy eyes meets yours, or when a super-soft cat rubs up against your leg. Pets can be there for you in ways that people can’t. They can offer love and companionship. They also enjoy comfortable silences, keep secrets and snuggle on the couch with you. Pets can be the best antidote to loneliness if they are given the chance.
“In fact, research shows that nursing home residents reported less loneliness when visited by dogs than when they spent time with other people. All these benefits can reduce the amount of stress people experience in response to feelings of social isolation and lack of social support from people”
http://www.mainstreet.com/article/family/family-health/7-ways-pets-lower-stress-and-save-you-money
Pets are not for everyone. They do come with a set of responsibilities that not everyone can handle. However, for most people the benefits of having a furry friend greatly outweigh the disadvantages. When times are tough it is nice to be able to talk to someone who you know is always willing to listen.
Who could resist this face? http://static.desktopnexus.com/wallpapers/6707-bigthumbnail.jpg
“Pets can control blood pressure better than drugs. Inhibiting drugs reduce blood pressure, but they aren’t as effective in controlling blood pressure due to stress and tension. Owning a pet such as a dog may encourage you to get out and exercise, helping to reduce obesity. Also, American studies have shown that patients who owned a pet had a much better chance of surviving for more than a year after a heart attack,” http://preventdisease.com/lifestyle/pets/articles/more_evidence_pets_lower_stress.html
This past May, my grandmother passed away. I have never seen any two people love one another more than my grandparents. Married for 65 years, it’s needless to say that he was very upset and depressed in losing her. I thought that it would be a good idea for him to get a pet. Being old, and somewhat fragile, I figured that a cat would be a perfect fit for him. A cat is a great, loyal, reliable friend to anyone that will give it attention.
Now, four months later, he is gradually doing better, and seems to be much happier. When I asked him why, he told me because he is no longer alone. The cat has definitely helped him in more ways than one. She provides company for him while he eats dinner and she even sleeps with him. This is definitely beneficial to older people who have lost loved ones, like my grandfather, as well as people who have had health problems. Pets tend to ward off elderly depression with just a lick on the hand, or the purr of a cat.
Pets can help reduce stress more than people; even more than talking about your problems with a best friend. Recent research shows when conducting a task that’s stressful, people have truly experienced less stress when their pets were with them than when a friend or family member was present. This reason might be because pets don’t judge us, they just love us.
I know that whenever I am upset or need to talk, I always turn to my cat, Mystic. As crazy as it sounds I’m aware that other people do this as well. It’s just nice to talk and not be interrupted, or judged on what I am saying. Sometimes I don’t want my friends or family to know about things that are bothering me, so I know I can talk to my pest, and they won’t tell anyone.
For those who love animals, me included, it is virtually impossible to stay in a bad mood when a pair of loving puppy eyes meets yours, or when a super-soft cat rubs up against your leg. Pets can be there for you in ways that people can’t. They can offer love and companionship. They also enjoy comfortable silences, keep secrets and snuggle on the couch with you. Pets can be the best antidote to loneliness if they are given the chance.
“In fact, research shows that nursing home residents reported less loneliness when visited by dogs than when they spent time with other people. All these benefits can reduce the amount of stress people experience in response to feelings of social isolation and lack of social support from people”
http://www.mainstreet.com/article/family/family-health/7-ways-pets-lower-stress-and-save-you-money
Pets are not for everyone. They do come with a set of responsibilities that not everyone can handle. However, for most people the benefits of having a furry friend greatly outweigh the disadvantages. When times are tough it is nice to be able to talk to someone who you know is always willing to listen.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Kanye's diss on Taylor, my opinion
MY OPINION, with some support from the VMAs and various websites
We have got one big reason to call this year’s MTV VMAS Awards night one crazy show. The show brought many wild moments from some of our favorite and not so favorite celebrities. Celebrity wars are nothing new to us. However, for 19 year-old Taylor Swift this was something that she has never experienced on live TV before. Smiling, and very excited she started her acceptance speech for Best Female Video, and then was rudely interrupted by celeb Kanye West.
West yet again continued his history of on-stage award-show rants. The rapper stormed the stage just after the first award was presented to Taylor Swift. He cut the teen singer off, grabbing the microphone and protesting in support of Beyoncé Knowles.
This is pretty bothersome. Who nominated Kanye West as a judge? Oh, wait no one did. What did Taylor Swift do to him; nothing. Who gave him the authority to jump up on stage, grab the mic, steal her moment of glory and turn the focus on Knowles? This left Swift silent and confused on stage. The audience started to cheer and applaud her, however, she never got to finish her speech, and her moment was ruined. This angered many of the other artists, as well as most of the fans watching the VMAs Sunday evening.
“According to reports from inside the house, once cameras cut away from the action, West flipped off the crowd and returned to his seat. Wale then said to the crowd, "You can't blame a man for speaking his mind." His words were met with boos, and Wale then said, "Kanye, I tried." During the next commercial break, Pink walked by the rapper and appeared to shake her head in disgust before security escorted her away. West remained steadfast amidst the commotion as he kissed his girlfriend Amber Rose” (Rodriguez, mtvnews.com) http://www.mtvnews.com/
Many fans were also outraged by this incident as it was displayed nationally via emails, internet blogs and magazine articles. I logged onto my Facebook where I saw about 20 status feeds about how rude West was and how messed up the situation was. It was only ten minutes after it happened and there was already YouTube videos and Twitter blogs about how racist West is. I would have to agree. Just because Swift is a young, white girl he acted out. If it was Rihanna I guarantee he would not have jumped up on stage and said what he said. He was comparing Swift to Knowles simply because he is black and therefore wanted Knowles to win because she is black. Just because Swift is a country singer and plays a guitar he verbally bashed her and ruined her moment of fame. Not only did he leave Swift speechless, but he embarrassed himself and made himself look like an idiot.
Here is a link to Kanye's blog apology...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/09/kanye-west-apologizes-to-taylor-swift-.html
How ironic that the next day West posted an apology to Swift, her mother and her fans on his blog. He doesn’t mean it. He is saying he’s sorry because “it’s the right thing to do.” He knows that now more than ever people are going to have him under a closer watch. This took a huge toll on his image and will definitely affect his career, what’s left of it. West then updated his blog a day later and apologized for a second time. Again, he doesn’t mean it.
West also apologize for the third time on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. He had his fake tears rolling down his cheeks, and an almost-convincing quiver in his voice. Then he throws on his shades, gets on stage and sings a lousy song, that if you listen to the lyrics you will see that it voided his entire ‘apology.’
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. However, if West didn’t think Swift should have won, which clearly he didn’t, that’s fine, but he should have kept his mouth shut.
Another website that helped me write this was from RollingStone Magz, http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/09/13/kanye-west-storms-the-vmas-stage-during-taylor-swifts-speech/
In case you are unfamiliar, here is a youtube clip of what Kanye did at teh VMAS,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=to6_7OEYrPU
We have got one big reason to call this year’s MTV VMAS Awards night one crazy show. The show brought many wild moments from some of our favorite and not so favorite celebrities. Celebrity wars are nothing new to us. However, for 19 year-old Taylor Swift this was something that she has never experienced on live TV before. Smiling, and very excited she started her acceptance speech for Best Female Video, and then was rudely interrupted by celeb Kanye West.
West yet again continued his history of on-stage award-show rants. The rapper stormed the stage just after the first award was presented to Taylor Swift. He cut the teen singer off, grabbing the microphone and protesting in support of Beyoncé Knowles.
This is pretty bothersome. Who nominated Kanye West as a judge? Oh, wait no one did. What did Taylor Swift do to him; nothing. Who gave him the authority to jump up on stage, grab the mic, steal her moment of glory and turn the focus on Knowles? This left Swift silent and confused on stage. The audience started to cheer and applaud her, however, she never got to finish her speech, and her moment was ruined. This angered many of the other artists, as well as most of the fans watching the VMAs Sunday evening.
“According to reports from inside the house, once cameras cut away from the action, West flipped off the crowd and returned to his seat. Wale then said to the crowd, "You can't blame a man for speaking his mind." His words were met with boos, and Wale then said, "Kanye, I tried." During the next commercial break, Pink walked by the rapper and appeared to shake her head in disgust before security escorted her away. West remained steadfast amidst the commotion as he kissed his girlfriend Amber Rose” (Rodriguez, mtvnews.com) http://www.mtvnews.com/
Many fans were also outraged by this incident as it was displayed nationally via emails, internet blogs and magazine articles. I logged onto my Facebook where I saw about 20 status feeds about how rude West was and how messed up the situation was. It was only ten minutes after it happened and there was already YouTube videos and Twitter blogs about how racist West is. I would have to agree. Just because Swift is a young, white girl he acted out. If it was Rihanna I guarantee he would not have jumped up on stage and said what he said. He was comparing Swift to Knowles simply because he is black and therefore wanted Knowles to win because she is black. Just because Swift is a country singer and plays a guitar he verbally bashed her and ruined her moment of fame. Not only did he leave Swift speechless, but he embarrassed himself and made himself look like an idiot.
Here is a link to Kanye's blog apology...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/09/kanye-west-apologizes-to-taylor-swift-.html
How ironic that the next day West posted an apology to Swift, her mother and her fans on his blog. He doesn’t mean it. He is saying he’s sorry because “it’s the right thing to do.” He knows that now more than ever people are going to have him under a closer watch. This took a huge toll on his image and will definitely affect his career, what’s left of it. West then updated his blog a day later and apologized for a second time. Again, he doesn’t mean it.
West also apologize for the third time on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. He had his fake tears rolling down his cheeks, and an almost-convincing quiver in his voice. Then he throws on his shades, gets on stage and sings a lousy song, that if you listen to the lyrics you will see that it voided his entire ‘apology.’
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. However, if West didn’t think Swift should have won, which clearly he didn’t, that’s fine, but he should have kept his mouth shut.
Another website that helped me write this was from RollingStone Magz, http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/09/13/kanye-west-storms-the-vmas-stage-during-taylor-swifts-speech/
In case you are unfamiliar, here is a youtube clip of what Kanye did at teh VMAS,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=to6_7OEYrPU
Thursday, September 17, 2009
News Organizations' Troubles
Some news organizations have had trouble adapting to the digital world for a few reasons. One reason is because they operate under a broadcast sensibility. They tend to produce discrete bias of centent, finished products meant for passive consumption
Some information and videos I found that are helpful come from this website, http://www.vanderbilt.edu . There is much evidence to support that big organizations and companies are having trouble making the transition from the old, fossilized technology to the newer modern, digital world.
Some researchers find this change to be healthy. For many young researchers this may be chaotic and frusterating. The digital aids to research such as having a wide access to electronic publications places greater stress on the researcher to keep up. Some organizations are having problems trying to keep up, once it has finally made the transition.
This site also helped to support this, http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10100&page=38
Some information and videos I found that are helpful come from this website, http://www.vanderbilt.edu . There is much evidence to support that big organizations and companies are having trouble making the transition from the old, fossilized technology to the newer modern, digital world.
Some researchers find this change to be healthy. For many young researchers this may be chaotic and frusterating. The digital aids to research such as having a wide access to electronic publications places greater stress on the researcher to keep up. Some organizations are having problems trying to keep up, once it has finally made the transition.
This site also helped to support this, http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10100&page=38
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Media Changes Over Time
When I think back about ten years I can distinctly remember my first cell phone. It was navy blue and it was rather bulky. It was a Nokia with a long embarassing antenna.
http://www.stopbuyingcrap.com/pics/sbc/cellphones1.jpg
I know now that cell phones have drastically changed over time, from touch screens to sliders, from black to red to pink. Cell phones now have cameras and internet access among many other applications. The Internet has also changed a lot in the past ten years. I remember my family's first computer and it's internet access. It was a dial up which took forever to connect. The biggest thing for me was to get on aol and hear the familiar "you've got mail!" I also loved instant messaging with friends. The internet now is much faster and easier to use. I have since 'upgraded' from my aol email account to a more professional account. I still use aim to message with friends, however, it is the updated version which also has its perks. Mass communication has become much easier over time, due to the advances in technology.
http://www.stopbuyingcrap.com/pics/sbc/cellphones1.jpg
I know now that cell phones have drastically changed over time, from touch screens to sliders, from black to red to pink. Cell phones now have cameras and internet access among many other applications. The Internet has also changed a lot in the past ten years. I remember my family's first computer and it's internet access. It was a dial up which took forever to connect. The biggest thing for me was to get on aol and hear the familiar "you've got mail!" I also loved instant messaging with friends. The internet now is much faster and easier to use. I have since 'upgraded' from my aol email account to a more professional account. I still use aim to message with friends, however, it is the updated version which also has its perks. Mass communication has become much easier over time, due to the advances in technology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
